CHICAGO PPP LOAN FRAUD LAWYERS: DEFENSES, LAWS, INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES

PPP Loan Fraud Allegations and the CARES Act

PPP loan fraud allegations affect many Chicago businesses under the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136), they often lead to wire fraud charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 or bank fraud charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Our firm see your stress, and Todd Spodek, a second-generation attorney, direct our team with a white glove approach. We use a digital portal so you can track every hearing date, we keep you informed at every turn. We remain selective because we value direct attention to each client’s outcome.

Indictments, Arraignment, and Netflix Recognition

When the government files an indictment, you face a quick arraignment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 10, timing is tight and leaves you little space to prepare. Todd Spodek, recognized from Netflix coverage of high-profile defense work, guide our strategy with immediate challenges to the prosecution’s claims. We rely on sworn affidavits and tackle probable cause by citing United States v. Roundtree, No. 21-CR-157 (N.D. Ill. 2021). We recognized as top rated because we gather all relevant evidence, and we don’t rest until your rights are safeguarded.

Asset Freezing Under 18 U.S.C. § 982

Prosecutors may invoke 18 U.S.C. § 982 to freeze funds tied to PPP loan overpayments, they claim it prevents dissipation of illegal gains. Todd Spodek focus on your financial records to show those funds were legitimate. We challenge the seizure with affidavits and discovery motions under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. We do this because every transaction deserve scrutiny before it gets labeled fraudulent.

Defending Against False Claims Allegations

A grand jury might allege false statements under 31 U.S.C. § 3729 if you misrepresented staff projections on your PPP application. We deploy motions in limine under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 to exclude prejudicial details about your spending patterns. Todd Spodek, a committed second-generation attorney, lead a careful review of each invoice and deposit. We want no untested evidence to shape your fate if the government’s case is flimsy.

Sentencing Factors and the Digital Portal

Sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 depends on intent and restitution possibilities, the court reviews your loan usage and cooperation. We file sentencing memoranda and invoke U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 5K1.1 if you assisted authorities early. We rely on our digital portal to organize character letters and transaction records so we can press for leniency. Todd Spodek push vigorously for alternatives to incarceration when you honor every correction measure.

Bail Conditions and Quick Release

Bail conditions can be harsh under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 if the court labels you a flight risk or sees suspicious finances, we push to show your employment and community ties are strong. Todd Spodek direct the legal team to challenge any claim of hidden assets. We gather statements from employers or colleagues who rely on you, we do this to highlight your stability. We argued for unconditional release in many cases so you can continue normal life while awaiting trial.

Trial Preparation and a High-Profile Edge

Trial often unfolds under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, you need a tight defense to confront the government’s timeline. Todd Spodek, who garnered attention from a Netflix legal feature, lead our cross-examination approach with forensic accountants on standby. We file exhibit lists, prep witnesses, and expose inconsistencies in the prosecution’s narrative. Our attorneys fights vigorously to prevent rushed judgments against you.

Plea Negotiations Under Federal Rule 11

Plea discussions proceed under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, the government might offer reduced charges if you concede certain points. Todd Spodek coordinate with prosecutors, scrutinizing each plea term for hidden traps. We share every proposed agreement so you see the direct consequences of a plea. Our approach revolve around clarity because we refuse to let you sign anything unread or misunderstood.

Appeals and Post-Judgment Options

If a verdict goes against you, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b) imposes a 14-day window for filing your notice of appeal. We rely on cases like United States v. Freedman, 977 F.3d 977 (7th Cir. 2020) to show appellate courts may reverse unfair sentencing enhancements. Todd Spodek review trial records for constitutional errors, we submit briefs focusing on procedural missteps. We handle appeals in the Seventh Circuit to ensure each argument get a fair hearing.

Post-Conviction Relief and Digital Oversight

Some convictions are subject to collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we can file a motion if your constitutional rights got violated at trial. Todd Spodek lead post-conviction reviews, checking police conduct and alleged prosecutorial errors. We use a digital portal to streamline every exhibit, we want you to see the evidence that may support a new hearing. We remain available so you can discuss urgent updates any day or night.

Facing Conspiracy Charges Under 18 U.S.C. § 371

Conspiracy accusations can arise under 18 U.S.C. § 371 if you allegedly coordinated with others to secure PPP funds illicitly. Todd Spodek direct our investigators to dig into phone records, bank logs, and co-defendant statements. We rely on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 to subpoena key evidence, we do this because each participant correlation must be tested. We stand ready to refute blanket claims that lump you into wrongdoing without proof.

Combatting Wiretap Evidence Under Title III

Government agents might produce intercepts under Title III, 18 U.S.C. § 2510, they allege those calls reveal intent to commit fraud. We counter by confirming authenticity through Federal Rule of Evidence 901, Todd Spodek lead scrutiny of chain-of-custody documents to spot alterations. We push to exclude improper wiretap transcripts if they lack compliance with statutes. Our stance revolve around your right to challenge every piece of evidence that threatens your freedom.

This material offers general information and does not form legal advice. For individualized counsel, reach out to Spodek Law Group.